0.06/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.15	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.14/0.34	% Computer   : n031.cluster.edu
0.14/0.34	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.34	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.34	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.34	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.14/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 13:36:29 EDT 2021
0.14/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.34	% Number of cores: 8
0.14/0.35	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.14/0.35	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.14/0.36	# No SInE strategy applied
0.14/0.36	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.37/0.63	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
0.37/0.63	# and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
0.37/0.63	#
0.37/0.63	# Preprocessing time       : 0.080 s
0.37/0.63	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.37/0.63	
0.37/0.63	# Proof found!
0.37/0.63	# SZS status Theorem
0.37/0.63	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.37/0.63	thf(fact_5_eval_Osimps_I4_J, axiom, ![X93:list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv, X154:paraco1604210848lle_fm, X155:paraco1604210848lle_fm]:(((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)!=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155)=>(((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ ($true))=>(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ ($true))=>(((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ (~$true))<=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ ($true)))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)<=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ ($true)))))))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)<=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_5_eval_Osimps_I4_J)).
0.37/0.63	thf(fact_1_a, axiom, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ ($true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_1_a)).
0.37/0.63	thf(conj_0, conjecture, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ p1 @ p2))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)).
0.37/0.63	thf(fact_0_a_H_H, axiom, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p1)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ ($true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_0_a_H_H)).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X93:list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv, X154:paraco1604210848lle_fm, X155:paraco1604210848lle_fm]:(((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)!=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155)=>(((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)=>(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)=>(((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)=>(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $false))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)=>(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154))))))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154)=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X155)=>(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X154 @ X155))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X93 @ X154))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[fact_5_eval_Osimps_I4_J])])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X2031:list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv, X2032:paraco1604210848lle_fm, X2033:paraco1604210848lle_fm]:((((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X2032 @ X2033))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2033)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2033))&(((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2033)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X2032 @ X2033))=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $false)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2033))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2033)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X2032 @ X2033))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2033))))&((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032)!=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2033)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X2032 @ X2033))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X2031 @ X2032))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X6:list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv, X22:paraco1604210848lle_fm, X5:paraco1604210848lle_fm]:((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X22 @ X5))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X22)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X22)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X22)=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X5)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X5)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X6:list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv, X5:paraco1604210848lle_fm, X22:paraco1604210848lle_fm]:((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X5 @ X22))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X5)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X5)!=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X22)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_8, plain, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[fact_1_a])])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ p1 @ p2))!=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p1), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X6:list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv, X5:paraco1604210848lle_fm, X22:paraco1604210848lle_fm]:((paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X5 @ X22))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X5)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X5)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ X6 @ X22)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_11, plain, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_12, plain, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p1)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[fact_0_a_H_H])])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ p1 @ p2))!=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X5:paraco1604210848lle_fm]:((paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ (paraco69239110le_Con @ X5 @ p2))=(paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ X5)|(paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ X5)=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_15, plain, (paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p1)!=(paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.37/0.63	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_15]), ['proof']).
0.37/0.63	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.37/0.63	# Proof object total steps             : 17
0.37/0.63	# Proof object clause steps            : 8
0.37/0.63	# Proof object formula steps           : 9
0.37/0.63	# Proof object conjectures             : 4
0.37/0.63	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
0.37/0.63	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
0.37/0.63	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
0.37/0.63	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
0.37/0.63	# Proof object generating inferences   : 2
0.37/0.63	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
0.37/0.63	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.37/0.63	# Parsed axioms                        : 558
0.37/0.63	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.37/0.63	# Initial clauses                      : 1000
0.37/0.63	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 269
0.37/0.63	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 731
0.37/0.63	# Processed clauses                    : 1729
0.37/0.63	# ...of these trivial                  : 86
0.37/0.63	# ...subsumed                          : 321
0.37/0.63	# ...remaining for further processing  : 1322
0.37/0.63	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 263
0.37/0.63	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.37/0.63	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
0.37/0.63	# Backward-rewritten                   : 41
0.37/0.63	# Generated clauses                    : 2807
0.37/0.63	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1981
0.37/0.63	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
0.37/0.63	# Paramodulations                      : 1867
0.37/0.63	# Factorizations                       : 7
0.37/0.63	# NegExts                              : 41
0.37/0.63	# Equation resolutions                 : 295
0.37/0.63	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.37/0.63	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.37/0.63	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.37/0.63	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.37/0.63	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.37/0.63	# Current number of processed clauses  : 646
0.37/0.63	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 153
0.37/0.63	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.37/0.63	#    Negative unit clauses             : 26
0.37/0.63	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 467
0.37/0.63	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1544
0.37/0.63	# ...number of literals in the above   : 5712
0.37/0.63	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.37/0.63	# Current number of archived clauses   : 641
0.37/0.63	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 171645
0.37/0.63	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63222
0.37/0.63	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 228
0.37/0.63	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7367
0.37/0.63	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.37/0.63	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 82
0.37/0.63	# BW rewrite match successes           : 38
0.37/0.63	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.37/0.63	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.37/0.63	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 101992
0.37/0.63	
0.37/0.63	# -------------------------------------------------
0.37/0.63	# User time                : 0.269 s
0.37/0.63	# System time              : 0.013 s
0.37/0.63	# Total time               : 0.282 s
0.37/0.63	# Maximum resident set size: 2832 pages
0.37/0.63	EOF